Modernizing the federal government [electronic resource]
להגדלת הטקסט להקטנת הטקסט- ספר
Enhancing the performance of the civil service has been a central objective of the United States since the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 authorized a performance-based component to federal salary structures. In 2003, the National Commission on the Public Service, also known as the Volcker Commission, recommended that explicit pay-for-performance (PFP) systems be adopted more broadly throughout the federal government. The authors compare several proposals aimed at enhancing the role of PFP in the federal government: a White House proposal (the Working for America Act), which recommends that
כותר |
אור מופלא : מרן הרב קוק זצ"ל / מאת הרב זאב אריה רבינר. |
---|---|
מהדורה |
1st ed. |
מוציא לאור |
תל-אביב : [דפוס אילון] |
שנה |
תשל"ב |
הערות |
עמודים קצט-רנו כוללים: מפיהם ומפי כתבם של תלמידי הנצי"ב. |
הערת תוכן ותקציר |
Cover Preface Contents Figure Tables Summary Abbreviations Part One - Introduction Part Two - Pay for Performance: Social Science Perspective Part Three - PFP: Different Forms Part Four - The Appraisal System: A Source of Concern Personal Characteristics Rater Training Part Five - PFP in the Public Sector: Evidence Pay for Performance in the State Systems Part Six - PFP in the U.S. Federal Government The GS Structure How Are Employees Evaluated? Is Performance Evaluation Linked to Pay? Measuring Substandard Performance in the Federal Government Is It Necessary to Modify the GS System?Part Seven - Some Departures from the GS The DoD PFP Demonstration Projects What Is Broadband Pay? The SES FDIC and IRS Part Eight - Proposals to Change the GS Part Nine - Burgeoning Opposition to PFP The TSA Opposition to the DoD's PFP Scheme References Related Readings |
סדרה |
Occasional paper / Rand Corporation |
היקף החומר |
1 online resource (55 p.) |
שפה |
אנגלית |
מספר מערכת |
997010716430905171 |
תצוגת MARC
יודעים עוד על הפריט? זיהיתם טעות?