العودة إلى نتائج البحث

Philosophy and German literature, 1700-1990

لتكبير النص لتصغير النص
  • كتاب

Although the importance of the interplay of literature and philosophy in Germany has often been examined within individual works or groups of works by particular authors, little research has been undertaken into the broader dialogue of German literature and philosophy as a whole. Philosophy and German Literature 1700-1990 offers six chapters by leading specialists on the dialogue between the work of German literary writers and philosophers through their works. The volume shows that German literature, far from being the mouthpiece of a dour philosophical culture dominated by the great names of Leibniz, Kant, Hegel, Marx, Heidegger and Habermas, has much more to offer: while possessing a high affinity with philosophy it explores regions of human insight and experience beyond philosophy's ken.

العنوان Philosophy and German literature, 1700-1990 / edited by Nicholas Saul. [electronic resource]
عنوان بديل Philosophy & German Literature, 1700-1990
الطبعة 1st ed.
الناشر Cambridge : Cambridge University Press
تاريخ الإصدار 2002
ملاحظات Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
Includes bibliographical references (p. 291-306) and index.
English
رقم الرف Introduction: German literature and philosophy / Nicholas Saul -- Criticism and experience: philosophy and literature in the German Enlightenment / John A. McCarthy -- The pursuit of the subject: literature as critic and perfecter of philosophy, 1790-1830 / Nicholas Saul -- Two realisms: German literature and philosophy, 1830-1890 / John Walker -- Modernism and the self, 1890-1924 / Ritchie Robertson -- The subject of community: aspiration, memory, resistance, 1918-1945 / Russell A. Berman -- Coming to terms with the past in postwar literature and philosophy / Robert C. Holub.
سلسلة Cambridge studies in German
الشكل 1 online resource (xii, 324 pages) : digital, PDF file(s).
اللغة الانكليزية
رقم النظام 997010700274105171
MARC RECORDS

أتعرفون المزيد عن هذا العنصر؟ وجدتم خطأ ما؟