Delay discounting (Psychology)

Enlarge text Shrink text
  • Topic
| System number 987007572811405171

Information for Authority record

Name (Hebrew)
עיכוב השהייה (פסיכולוגיה)
Name (Latin)
Delay discounting (Psychology)
Name (Arabic)
تأخير الخصم (علم النفس)
Other forms of name
Discounting, Delay (Psychology)
Discounting, Intertemporal (Psychology)
Intertemporal choice
Intertemporal discounting (Psychology)
See Also From tracing topical name
Choice (Psychology)
Reward (Psychology)
MARC
MARC

Other Identifiers

Wikidata: Q816125
Library of congress: sh2013002387
Sources of Information
  • Work cat: Avsar, K.B. fMRI investigation of intertemporal discounting in schizophrenia, 2011:p. 8 (Delay discounting (DD) is an empirical construct based on the observation that as delays to receiving rewards increase, the valuation of rewards decreases, resulting in a preference for smaller, but more immediate rewards. In other words, a future reward must be of greater nominal value to be more attractive over an immediate reward)
  • Personality and individual differences, Dec. 2009:p. 973 (There has been discussion over the extent to which delay discounting--as prototypically shown by a preference for a smaller-sooner sum of money over a larger-later sum--measures the same kind of impulsive preferences that drive non-financial behavior. ... Given the choice, people generally prefer to receive pleasant things---such as money, food, or in the case of smokers, nicotine---sooner rather than later, and the attractiveness of a reward is reduced by increasing delay until its receipt)
  • Behavioral interventions, Feb. 2005:p. 102 (Delay discounting is a behavior analytic approach to understanding how different people make choices between smaller rewards given immediately and larger rewards given after a delay, to assess the degree of impulsivity or self-control)
  • Physiology & behavior, July 2010:p. 441 (The idea that people may prefer smaller immediate rewards over larger but delayed ones is also the construct that is central to delay discounting, where people are asked a series of questions regarding whether they would prefer a smaller, but more immediate reward, versus a larger, but more delayed reward)
  • Marketing letters, Dec. 2005:pp. 347-348 (The psychology of intertemporal discounting ... . Intertemporal choice refers to a choice between options whose consequences occur at different points in time. Examples of intertemporal choice include: Receiving 10 [dollars] today, or 12 [dollars] in a week, choosing between chocolate cake and fruit for dessert, saving versus spending money now, promising to write a journal article or teach an extra course in the next academic term, choosing a major in college, and deciding whether to smoke a cigarette. In each of these cases, a decision maker needs to trade off the utility (or value) of one outcome that is temporally proximal (typically immediate) with another one that is temporally distant)

Wikipedia description:

Delayed gratification, or deferred gratification, is the ability to resist the temptation of an immediate reward in favor of a more valuable and long-lasting reward later. It involves forgoing a smaller, immediate pleasure to achieve a larger or more enduring benefit in the future. A growing body of literature has linked the ability to delay gratification to a host of other positive outcomes, including academic success, physical health, psychological health, and social competence. A person's ability to delay gratification relates to other similar skills such as patience, impulse control, self-control and willpower, all of which are involved in self-regulation. Broadly, self-regulation encompasses a person's capacity to adapt the self as necessary to meet demands of the environment. Delaying gratification is the reverse of delay discounting, which is "the preference for smaller immediate rewards over larger but delayed rewards" and refers to the "fact that the subjective value of reward decreases with increasing delay to its receipt". It is theorized that the ability to choose delayed rewards may either arise from developmental plasticity or depend on behavioral plasticity, as described in the cognitive-affective personality system (CAPS) model. Several factors can affect a person's ability to delay gratification. Cognitive strategies, such as the use of distracting or "cool" thoughts, can increase delay ability, as can neurological factors, such as strength of connections in the frontal-striatal pathway. Behavioral researchers have focused on the contingencies that govern choices to delay reinforcement, and have studied how to manipulate those contingencies in order to lengthen delay. Age plays a role too; children under five years old demonstrate a marked lack of delayed gratification ability and most commonly seek immediate gratification. A very small difference between males and females suggest that females may be better at delaying rewards. The inability to choose to wait rather than seek immediate reinforcement is related to avoidance-related behaviors such as procrastination, and to other clinical diagnoses such as anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and depression. Sigmund Freud, the founder of psychoanalytic theory, discussed the ego's role in balancing the immediate pleasure-driven desires of the id with the morality-driven choices of the superego. Funder and Block expanded psychoanalytic research on the topic, and found that impulsivity, or a lack of ego-control, has a stronger effect on one's ability to choose delayed rewards if a reward is more desirable. Finally, environmental and social factors play a role; for example, delay is affected by the self-imposed or external nature of a reward contingency, by the degree of task engagement required during the delay, by early mother-child relationship characteristics, by a person's previous experiences with unreliable promises of rewards (e.g., in poverty), and by contemporary sociocultural expectations and paradigms. Research on animals comprises another body of literature describing delayed gratification characteristics that are not as easily tested in human samples, such as ecological factors affecting the skill.

Read more on Wikipedia >