Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation

Enlarge text Shrink text
  • Corporate Body
| System number 987007441677405171

Information for Authority record

Name (Latin)
Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation
Other forms of name
Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation
Ash Institute for Democratic Governance & Innovation
Ash Institute for Democratic Innovation and Governance
John F. Kennedy School of Government. Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation
Roy and Lila Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation
MARC
MARC

Other Identifiers

VIAF: 132406424
Wikidata: Q4804362
Library of congress: no2005111098
TAU10: 000482820
Sources of Information
  • Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation website, viewed 2 July 2018:About > History (Harvard Kennedy School, Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation; Ash Center was established in 2003 as the Ash Institute; in 2008, under the leadership of Ash Center Director Anthony Saich, Asia Programs (now Rajawali Foundation Institute for Asia) joined the Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation. The expanded Ash Institute--now called the Ash Center ...)
  • Democracy in Bangladesh, 2011:p. xvii (Ash Institute for Democratic Governance & Innovation)
  • From reformasi to institutional transformation, c2011:t.p. (Harvard Kennedy School, Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation)
  • Government Innovators Network welcome page, Nov. 15, 2005(The Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation at the Harvard's John F. Kennedy School of Government)
  • OCLC, Nov. 15, 2005(hdg. : Ash Institute for Democratic Innovation and Governance)
  • Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation web site, Nov. 15, 2005(Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation; Roy and Lila Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation; endowment from Roy and Lila Ash enabled the Kennedy School of Government to establish the Ash Institute for Democratic Governance and Innovation, May 2003)
  • v LCN