Schleppegrell, Mary

Enlarge text Shrink text
  • Personality
| System number 987007377135405171

Information for Authority record

Name (Latin)
Schleppegrell, Mary
Other forms of name
Schleppegrell, Mary J
Date of birth
1950-10-17
Field of activity
Linguistics
Occupation
College teachers
Linguists
Associated Language
eng
Gender
female
MARC
MARC

Other Identifiers

VIAF: 21702930
Wikidata: Q106299768
Library of congress: no 90013180
Sources of Information
  • Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages, 2002:t.p. (Mary J. Schleppegrell)
  • Her The older language learner, 1987:t.p. (Mary Schleppegrell)
  • Schleppegrell, Mary J. The language of schooling, 2010:title page (Mary J. Schleppegrell, University of California, Davis)
  • Schleppegrell, Mary J. The language of schooling, c2004:CIP t.p. (Mary J. Schleppegrell) data sheet (b. 10/17/50)
  • University of California, Davis website, April 27, 2015(Mary J. Schleppegrell, Professor Emerita, Department of Linguistics)
  • University of Michigan website, April 27, 2015(Mary J. Schleppegrell, Professor and Chair of Educational Studies; PhD in linguistics from Georgetown University)
  • The language of schooling, 2004:t.p. (Mary J. Schleppegrell)

Wikipedia description:

Mary J. Schleppegrell (born October 17, 1950) is an applied linguist and Professor of Education at the University of Michigan. Her research and praxis are based on the principles of Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL), a theory derived from the work of social semiotic linguist Michael Halliday. Schleppegrell is known for the SFL-based literacy practices she has continuously helped to develop for multilingual and English language learners throughout her decades long career, which she began as an educational specialist before transitioning to the field of applied linguistics. As a result, her publications demonstrate a deep understanding of both the theories and practices related to teaching and learning. Schleppegrell believes that academic success after the elementary years is closely tied to explicit instruction with regard to the acquisition of academic language. Consequently, she maintains that students should be taught to "unpack" meanings encoded in authentic academic texts of different genres rather than be provided with easier, teacher-modified versions of these texts stating that, "you can’t really make it simpler and still maintain the level of content. You have to amplify instruction around it.”

Read more on Wikipedia >