Midrash rabbah. Ecclesiastes

Enlarge text Shrink text
  • Title
| System number 987007286639405171

Information for Authority record

Name (Hebrew)
מדרש רבה. קהלת
Name (Latin)
Midrash rabbah. Ecclesiastes
Name (Arabic)
مدراش ربا. سفر الجامعة
Other forms of name
Midrasch Qohelet Rabba
Midrash Ḳohelet rabati
Midrash rabba. Qohelet a
Midrash Qohelet rabba
Midrash rabba. Ecclesiastes
Qohelet rabba
Qohelet rabbah
Midrash rabbah. Qohelet
Ecclesiastes rabbah
Midrash rabbah. Kohelet
Kohelet rabbah
קהלת רבה (מדרש)
NLI Collection
UHJ
MARC
MARC

Other Identifiers

VIAF: 174985068
Wikidata: Q3046918
Library of congress: n 80017399
Sources of Information
  • Its Midrash ... 1834:t.p. (Midrash Ḳohelet rabati)
  • Its Midrash rabah, 1967:t.p. (Midrash rabah, Ḳohelet) added t.p. (Midrash rabbah Koheleth (Ecclesiastes))
  • Rabbinic views of Kohelet, 1999:CIP table of cont. (Qohelet rabbah)
  • Wachten, J. Midrasch-Analyse, 1978 (subj.)t.p. (Midrasch Qohelet Rabba)

Wikipedia description:

Ecclesiastes Rabbah or Kohelet Rabbah (Hebrew: קהלת רבה) is an aggadic commentary on Ecclesiastes, included in the collection of the Midrash Rabbot. It follows the biblical book verse by verse, only a few verses remaining without commentary. In the list of the old sedarim for the Bible, four sedarim are assigned to Ecclesiastes (beginning at 1:1, 3:13, 7:1, and 9:7); and Kohelet Rabbah was probably divided according to these sections. This appears from the phrase "Sidra tinyana" ("second seder") inserted between the comments to Ecclesiastes 6:12 and 7:1, and the phrase "Sidra telita'a" ("third seder") between the comments to Ecclesiastes 9:6 and 9:7. These phrases occur at the end of the second and third midrash sections, in the same way that "Selik sidra" indicates the end of sections in earlier editions of Ruth Rabbah and Esther Rabbah. The commentary to 3:12 having been lost, so is the phrase "first seder" that would likely have followed it. Nothing remains to indicate where one section ends and another begins, as there is no introductory remark to the commentary on 3:13. But an introduction is also lacking to the commentary on 7:1 and 9:7.

Read more on Wikipedia >