Macleod, J. J. R. 1876-1935
Enlarge text Shrink text-
Save successfulThe item can be found in your Personal ZoneשגיאהLog in to your account to save
Information for Authority record
- Canadiana, May 26, 2021(heading: Macleod, J. J. R. (John James Rickard), 1876-1935)
- Fundamentals of human physiology, 1924:title page (J.J.R. Macleod, M.B., D.Sc., F.R.S., professor of physiology in the University of Toronto, Toronto; formerly professor of physiology, Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio)
- OCLC, May 26, 2021(access points: Macleod, John James Richard; Macleod, John James Richard, 1876-; Macleod, John James Rickard; Macleod, John James Rickard, 1876-; Macleod, John James Rickard, 1876-1935; Macleod, John J. R.; Macleod, John J.; Macleod, J. J. R.; Macleod, J. J. R. (John James Richard), 1876-1935; Macleod, J. J. R. (John James Rickard), 1876-1935; Macleod, J. J. R., 1876-1935; predominant usage: J.J.R. Macleod; other usages: John J.R. Macleod; John James Rickard Macleod)
- The discovery of insulin, 2021:LAC CIP application (John Macleod)
- John Macleod (John James Rickard Macleod; Scottish biochemist and physiologist; he is noted for his role in the discovery and isolation of insulin during his tenure as a lecturer at the University of Toronto ( (Wikipedia, viewed on May 26, 2021:) )
- LCCN 56-58309: Bard, P. Medical physiology, 1956(hdg.: Macleod, John James Rickard, 1876-1935)
- LC data base, 7-19-85(hdg.: Macleod, John James Rickard, 1876-1935; usage: John James Rickard Macleod)
Wikipedia description:
John James Rickard Macleod (6 September 1876 – 16 March 1935), was a Scottish biochemist and physiologist. He devoted his career to diverse topics in physiology and biochemistry, but was chiefly interested in carbohydrate metabolism. He is noted for his role in the discovery and isolation of insulin during his tenure as a lecturer at the University of Toronto, for which he and Frederick Banting received the 1923 Nobel prize in Physiology or Medicine. Awarding the prize to Macleod was controversial at the time, because according to Banting's version of events, Macleod's role in the discovery was negligible. It was not until decades after the events that an independent review acknowledged a far greater role than was attributed to him at first.
Read more on Wikipedia >