Trevelyan, George Macaulay, 1876-1962

Enlarge text Shrink text
  • Personality
| System number 987007268909405171

Information for Authority record

Name (Hebrew)
טרולין, ג'ורג' מקולי, 1876-1962
Name (Latin)
Trevelyan, George Macaulay, 1876-1962
Other forms of name
Trevelʹi︠a︡n, Dzhordzh Makoleĭ, 1876-1962
Trevelyan, G. M. (George Macaulay), 1876-1962
Date of birth
1876
Date of death
1962
Gender
male
MARC
MARC

Other Identifiers

VIAF: 24609782
Wikidata: Q1373357
Library of congress: n 50011776
Sources of Information
  • England under the Stuarts, c1904:t.p. (G.M. Trevelyan, late fellow of Trinity Coll., Cambridge)
  • LCN
1 / 1

Wikipedia description:

George Macaulay Trevelyan (16 February 1876 – 21 July 1962) was an English historian and academic. He was a Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, from 1898 to 1903. He then spent more than twenty years as a full-time author. He returned to the University of Cambridge and was Regius Professor of History from 1927 to 1943. He served as Master of Trinity College from 1940 to 1951. In retirement, he was Chancellor of Durham University. Trevelyan was the third son of Sir George Otto Trevelyan, 2nd Baronet, and great-nephew of Thomas Babington Macaulay. He espoused Macaulay's staunch liberal Whig principles in accessible works of literate narrative unfettered by scholarly neutrality, his style becoming old-fashioned in the course of his long and productive career. The historian E. H. Carr considered Trevelyan to be one of the last historians of the Whig tradition. Many of his writings promoted the Whig Party, an important British political movement from the 17th to the mid-19th centuries, as well as its successor, the Liberal Party. Whigs and Liberals believed the common people had a more positive effect on history than did royalty and that democratic government would bring about steady social progress. Trevelyan's history is engaged and partisan. Of his Garibaldi trilogy, "reeking with bias", he remarked in his essay "Bias in History": "Without bias, I should never have written them at all. For I was moved to write them by a poetical sympathy with the passions of the Italian patriots of the period, which I retrospectively shared."

Read more on Wikipedia >