Back to search results

Early Romanticism and religious dissent

Enlarge text Shrink text
  • Book

Religious diversity and ferment characterize the period that gave rise to Romanticism in England. It is generally known that many individuals who contributed to the new literatures of the late eighteenth century came from Dissenting backgrounds, but we nonetheless often underestimate the full significance of nonconformist beliefs and practices during this period. Daniel White provides a clear and useful introduction to Dissenting communities, focusing on Anna Barbauld and her familial network of heterodox 'liberal' Dissenters whose religious, literary, educational, political, and economic activities shaped the public culture of early Romanticism in England. He goes on to analyze the roles of nonconformity within the lives and writings of William Godwin, Mary Wollstonecraft, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, and Robert Southey, offering a Dissenting genealogy of the Romantic movement.

Title Early Romanticism and religious dissent / Daniel E. White.
Additional Titles Early Romanticism & Religious Dissent
Publisher Cambridge : Cambridge University Press
Creation Date 2006
Notes Title from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
Includes bibliographical references (p. 230-255) and index.
English
Content "True principles of religion and liberty": liberal dissent and the Warrington Academy -- Anna Barbauld and devotional tastes: extempore, particular, experimental -- The "Joineriana": Barbauld, the Aikin family circle, and the Dissenting public sphere -- Godwinian scenes and popular politics: Godwin, Wollstonecraft, and the legacies of Dissent -- "Properer for a sermon": Coleridgean ministries -- "A Saracenic mosque, not a Quaker meeting-house": Southey's Thalaba, Islam, and religious nonconformity.
Series Cambridge studies in Romanticism
65
Extent 1 online resource (xiii, 266 pages) : digital, PDF file(s).
Language English
National Library system number 997010715764505171
MARC RECORDS

Have more information? Found a mistake?