Modernism at the microphone

להגדלת הטקסט להקטנת הטקסט
  • ספר

"As the Second World War raged throughout Europe, modernist writers often became crucial voices in the propaganda efforts of both sides. Modernism at the Microphone: Radio, Propaganda, and Literary Aesthetics During World War II is a comprehensive study of the role modernist writers' radio works played in the propaganda war and the relationship between modernist literary aesthetics and propaganda. Drawing on new archival research, the book covers the broadcast work of such key figures as George Orwell, Orson Welles, Dorothy L. Sayers, Louis MacNeice, Mulk Raj Anand, T.S. Eliot, and P.G. Wodehouse. In addition to the work of Anglo-American modernists, Melissa Dinsman also explores the radio work of exiled German writers, such as Thomas Mann, as well as Ezra Pound's notorious pro-fascist broadcasts. In this way, the book reveals modernism's engagement with new technologies that opened up transnational boundaries under the pressures of war."--Bloomsbury Publishing.

כותר Modernism at the microphone : radio, propaganda, and literary aesthetics during World War II / Melissa Dinsman.
מוציא לאור London : Bloomsbury Academic
שנה 2015
הערות Description based upon print version of record.
Also issued in print.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 231-242) and index.
הערת תוכן ותקציר 1. Introduction: The Voices of War -- 2. War on the Air: Adorno's and Welles's Radio Writings -- 3. Militarizing the Messiah: Sayers's and Eliot's Christian Rebranding of Wartime Britain -- 4. MacNeice's "Transatlantic Call": Modernist Complexity in a Mass Aural Medium -- 5. Orwell and his BBC "Voice": Propaganda, Literature, and New Networks -- 6. Clogged Communication: The Broadcasting and Epistolary Networks of MacLeish and Pound -- 7. Haunted Network: Mann's Los Angeles Broadcasts to Germany -- 8. Coda -- Bibliography -- Index.
סדרה Historicizing modernism
היקף החומר 1 online resource (262 p.)
שפה אנגלית
מספר מערכת 997010718133405171
תצוגת MARC

יודעים עוד על הפריט? זיהיתם טעות?